Relevant Links
Recent Content
AWS can't reach Private IP - Cato Client Windows
Hi, on my PC I have the Cato Client to connect to Cato Network. We have a connection with a virtual appliance in AWS in one account. In this account there is a TGW that connect other accounts. I can' reach the private IP of AWS accounts, but all networks are routed in Cato Configuration, TGW and VPC route tables seems ok....The source/destination check is disabled for LAN interface, the client subnet 10.41.0.0/16 is associated to subnet route table, tgw route table and there is also in the other account's route tables..... But the traffic is not going well..... any suggestion ? Many thanks Dario9Views0likes1CommentWireless Traffic Identified as DSCP18
This is driving me up the wall and I don't see a lot of good options, aside from pester support. We're an Aruba wireless shop and we have some WMM/QoS configured. This ends up with a bunch of events where the Application/Service detected is dscp18 because Cato is picking up on the QoS value from the access point. It makes my life difficult when we try to create WAN Firewall rules based on a service on a given destination(s). Aside from de-allocating that DSCP value on my production SSID's, what can I do? Has anyone else encountered this before?70Views0likes4CommentsAzure Virtual Desktop Session Host Routing
Hi, has anyone ever set up a route table on Azure so that the route to Microsoft Login subnets goes out through Cato? When we tried doing this, to make sure our AVD users are protected by Cato, users stopped being able to connect to session hosts through the AVD FQDN (broker). I suspect that its either TLS Inspection being enabled for Microsoft Login app (has never been an issue for our laptop users), or that AVD brokering system needs Microsoft Login traffic to go through the internet instead of a private route for some reason.65Views0likes2CommentsNetwork routing
Need some confirmation with the routing configuration. Under the Network routing, I can only see the UI says Subnet but I am pretty sure we should be able to route a host say 1.1.1.1/32 as well. The UI does not allow you to put 1.1.1.1/32. Can I just put 1.1.1.1 without the mask and be OKAY?Solved60Views0likes2CommentsConnectivity Alert Email - Interface Names
Hello, By default, the notification emails regarding a disconnected or degraded socket interface include the public IP address of the interface under "Interface Name". This does not match the port name in the socket configuration panel. Is it possible to modify this email template to include the descriptive name instead of, or ideally in addition to, the public IP address? This would be extremely helpful for quickly identifying which ISP is impacted. Not all network engineers have every single public IP in the company committed to memory! (Pictures have been redacted/edited to remove or alter sensitive information)146Views2likes10CommentsDHCP option to assign Cisco Wireless Controller
Hi Community, We have some sites that I'm trying to set a DHCP option to assign the controller IP to cisco 9105. I have a vendor rule on the AP's that get DHCP from our Microsoft DHCP servers. Was just curious if anyone has configured an option that works through Cato DHCP? Thank you.67Views0likes1Comment
Tags
- Community Document5 Topics
- Guidelines1 Topic
- ANNOUNCEMENT1 Topic