Pls find below details for raising RFE:-
RFE Name: Split Tunnel Policy configuration basis FQDNs or Domain Names.
What is the specific use case or problem?
Many websites especially Government websites are not opening while users are connected via either SDP client or behind a site. We have to bypass traffic from CATO for these kind of websites or application so that traffic is not routed via Cato. We don't have Socket in our organisation but we have SDP and Site license.
Describe the current functionality:
Currently, we can only specify IP addresses for split tunnelling, which limits our ability to manage traffic based on the domain names/FQDN. This requires us to manually update IP addresses whenever there are changes. This is a complete manual process to first find out Global/public IP of the affected website and then manually add in split tunnel policy instead of bypassing entire domain of the government which we don't want to route via Cato.
Describe the proposed solution:
We request the ability to specify FQDNs or Domains in the split tunnel configuration. This would allow us to define splitting tunnel basis FQDN/ domain names, making it easier to manage and update our network configurations. And also, this will provide more flexibility in defining routing rules.
Existing Solution / Workaround: Currently we are manually updating the public IP address in split tunnel policy which is not a better option to do.
Priority (Low / Medium / High): High
